Open Feedback Dialog
Home | Sitemap
 

 

QUICK LINKS
Skip Navigation Links
ABOUT US
LIBRARY
RESOURCES
NATURE TRAVEL
PRODUCT STORE
CONTACT US
Skip Navigation Links
MY PAGE
Chat Archives
Chat on "Conserving wildlife in fragmented landscapes" dated January 15, 2012
  • Vinay Nadig: Hi Shankar , vinay here from NCF`s EcoQuest in Mysore
  • Sandeep Ghosh.: Good Evening, Folks! Am I glad to be back, Susan!
  • T R Shankar Raman: Good evening, all! And hello Vinay... good to see you here!
  • PRAVEEN V: Good Evening sir. Great to make it IWF chat finally
  • T R Shankar Raman: Yes, it is good to meet you all on this chat to talk about conserving wildlife in our increasingly fragmented landscapes.
  • rohit: hi everyone
  • T R Shankar Raman: Hi Rohit
  • rohit: after a long wait
  • rohit: finally iwc chat came
  • Susan Sharma: Glad to see the good response
  • rohit: so how can we start?
  • rohit: dear shankar raman, so you are maderator today, am i right?
  • PRAVEEN V: I would like to know about your activities and how a common man like me can contribute
  • PRAVEEN V: I stay quite close - Palakkad!!
  • T R Shankar Raman: Yes, I am. Perhaps begin with a brief introduction to the theme?
  • T R Shankar Raman: I work with colleagues and students on effects of rainforest fragmentation in the southern Western Ghats.
  • T R Shankar Raman: We are based out of a research station in the Anamalai hills.
  • Sandeep Ghosh.: R fragmented landscapes synonymous with habitat fragmentation??
  • T R Shankar Raman: Well, fragmented landscapes are a consequence of the process of habitat fragmentation.
  • rohit: @ sandeep ya i hope so..
  • Sandeep Ghosh.: don't hope PLEASE!! tell me definitely, Shankar!!
  • T R Shankar Raman: When a large tract of forest, for instance, is broken into smaller patches by agriculture and development, for example.
  • Sandeep Ghosh.: so the two are the same!!
  • PRAVEEN V: Now that the existing fragmentation is a reality, whats the best alternative to ensure habit fragmentation does not get more serious?
  • T R Shankar Raman: The process of loss of forest and isolation of the remaining patches is habitat fragmentation. While...
  • rohit: which areas in india are most suffererd from fragmentation shankar?
  • T R Shankar Raman: the resulting landscape of forest patches, with the surrounding 'matrix' of agriculture, dams, development etc. is the fragmented landscape.
  • rohit: okies...
  • Sandeep Ghosh.: so fragmentation of landscape is a direct consequence of habitat fragmentation!!
  • T R Shankar Raman: @ Praveen: To ensure habitat fragmentation does not get more serious, we can identify areas that are relatively 'unfragmented' and work to first conserve them.
  • T R Shankar Raman: @ Sandeep: yes
  • Sandeep Ghosh.: easier said than done!!
  • T R Shankar Raman: But we can also, try to prevent further fragmentation by minimising or reversing the effects of fragmentation.
  • Sandeep Ghosh.: identifying such areas needs extensive coordination
  • rohit: @ shankar by maintainig corridors ??
  • T R Shankar Raman: This could be done through restoration of links ('corridors'), making surrounding matrix more hospitable for wildlife, and so on.
  • Sandeep Ghosh.: between wildlife conservationists and forest officers
  • PRAVEEN V: conserving unfragmented area is one side, but how to bypass existing fragmentation so that the birds and animals dont get disturbed further
  • Sandeep Ghosh.: which is asking for the impossible at least in India
  • PRAVEEN V: ok, u've answered that before I cud type the question :)
  • Sandeep Ghosh.: since they don't trust each other much
  • Sandeep Ghosh.: this is from hard experience
  • T R Shankar Raman: @rohit: yes, corridors are important, but not the only approach. We cannot have corridors (esp. as forest corridors) everywhere.
  • Vinay Nadig: I would like to bring in the recent elephants running in the streets of mysore as an example
  • T R Shankar Raman: One should look at surrounding habitats, including human-use or modified habitats as well.
  • T R Shankar Raman: @ Sandeep: I agree that it requires extensive coordination between wildlife scientists, forest officers, local people.
  • PRAVEEN V: can u explain a bit about your NCF activities and how effective have your activities been in avoiding the above?
  • T R Shankar Raman: It is not easy, but one should try. Often, reducing the effects of fragmentation will benefit, not only wildlife, but could benefit people as well.
  • Sandeep Ghosh.: shankar I beg to differ
  • Sandeep Ghosh.: from your last statement
  • rohit: so how to work a way out for conserving existing wildlife in a already fragmented landscape?
  • Sandeep Ghosh.: the effects of fragmentation could help in saving certain types of wildlife
  • T R Shankar Raman: For instance, reducing the likelihood or incidence of human-wildlife conflict could emerge from reversing the effects of fragmentation.
  • Sandeep Ghosh.: but not all wildlife can benefit from it
  • T R Shankar Raman: @ Praveen: NCF is trying to protect existing rainforest fragments outside the Anamalai Tiger Reserve, in partnership with private plantations.
  • Sandeep Ghosh.: reversing the effects of habitat fragmentation takes up valuable time
  • T R Shankar Raman: We also carry out restoration of degraded forest fragments to enhance their quality and use for wildlife.
  • Sandeep Ghosh.: and that is one commodity which we have in extreme short supply
  • T R Shankar Raman: Simultaneously, we work to minimise human-wildlife conflict involving species such as elephants and leopards that move through such landscapes.
  • Sandeep Ghosh.: wildlife does not consist only of mammals
  • T R Shankar Raman: @ Sandeep: could you explain what you mean by not all wildlife will benefit from it.
  • Sandeep Ghosh.: what about the birds??
  • Sandeep Ghosh.: Shankar, yes i can explain
  • T R Shankar Raman: Please do... my PhD research included a study on the effects of forest fragmentation and plantations on birds.
  • T R Shankar Raman: I'm curious to know why you think reversing the effects of fragmentation will not benefit all birds (you are partly right!).
  • Sandeep Ghosh.: Those forest species which are conservation reliant can experience problems
  • Sandeep Ghosh.: in habitat fragmentation
  • rohit: birds can escape from deleterious effects of fragmentation to some extent..
  • Sandeep Ghosh.: but certain other species which do not
  • T R Shankar Raman: @ rohit: First steps include identifying the species that are affected and possible ecological causes. Then species- and site-specific steps...
  • rohit: @sandeep ya i was banging my head for this name 'reliant'..
  • Sandeep Ghosh.: rely on conservation
  • T R Shankar Raman: Yes, birds, may be less impacted because they can fly... but not all birds. Many rainforest birds are highly sedentary and habitat-specific.
  • Sandeep Ghosh.: can survive on their own by moving from one habitat to another
  • rohit: hmmm..
  • T R Shankar Raman: For instance, understorey flycatchers and babblers. In the Neotropics research has shown how small birds will not fly across gaps created by
  • T R Shankar Raman: agriculture, roads, etc.
  • Sandeep Ghosh.: exactly
  • Sandeep Ghosh.: if forest fragmentation results in barren land, then neither one nor the other can survive
  • T R Shankar Raman: In my research, for instance, rainforest birds like trogons and endemic understorey flycatchers, for e.g., seemed more affected by fragmentation.
  • Sandeep Ghosh.: and in india the problem is heading for that consequence
  • T R Shankar Raman: Widespread, common birds, especially birds of more open forests, such as some bulbuls, tailorbird, etc. actually benefit from fragmentation.
  • Sandeep Ghosh.: yes, but endemic species reach extinction faster
  • T R Shankar Raman: Thus reversing the effects of fragmentation may affect some birds, but these are usually more common species of not so high conservation value..
  • rohit: and genetic variability and gene pool thing
  • T R Shankar Raman: as the endemic and specialised birds are.
  • Sandeep Ghosh.: that is only the case with mammals, rohit
  • rohit: ohh..
  • T R Shankar Raman: @rohit: I'm not sure if I clarified your point...
  • Sandeep Ghosh.: with bird species and insect species what gene pool are you going to create
  • PRAVEEN V: when u say they dont benefit by reversing fragmentation does not mean they are adversely affected, right?
  • T R Shankar Raman: Yes, there can certainly be genetic consequences as well. In general affecting the more localised and sedentary species more perhaps.
  • Sandeep Ghosh.: praveen, they are driven to extinction
  • rohit: @shankar...you clarified my point very well actually...
  • T R Shankar Raman: Well, in highly fragmented landscapes, I think reversing the effects of fragmentation may affect some species, but is unlikely to drive them extinct.
  • PRAVEEN V: @sandeep, am not clear on this
  • rohit: @sandeep i think every species and genus has a unique gene pool.
  • PRAVEEN V: ok not extinct, but how is it adversely affected?
  • T R Shankar Raman: This is because there will always be spaces in the surrounding landscape for the disturbance-adapted species: or 'matrix-tolerant' species.
  • Sandeep Ghosh.: yes, rohit, but how are you going to conserve a gene pool for the avifauna??
  • Sandeep Ghosh.: u certainly cannot catch all the birds and insects and.....
  • T R Shankar Raman: What we are trying to do is really to provide conservation support for the endemic species... a better prospect for those negatively affected by fragmentation
  • Sandeep Ghosh.: transport them from one place to another, can you rohit??
  • Sandeep Ghosh.: Shankar, please tell me more
  • T R Shankar Raman: Genetic effects may not be restricted to mammals. Studies have shown effects on birds, butterflies... many taxa. But one does not want to...
  • rohit: i am actually talking about genetic variabil;ity which is required for survival...as darwin says
  • T R Shankar Raman: 'catch all the birds and insects' to conserve the gene pool. We should try to conserve biological diversity (genes-communities) in situ...
  • Sandeep Ghosh.: yes biological diversity conservation is right!
  • rohit: that can only be maintained if organisms of different genetic combinations can mate...which is reduced to some extent in an island fragmented area
  • T R Shankar Raman: I am not an expert on genetics of fragmented populations, so cannot really comment in detail. I do feel that many ecological aspects require...
  • Sandeep Ghosh.: but the way forward is beset with extreme difficulties!!
  • T R Shankar Raman: more immediate attention on the ground.
  • Sandeep Ghosh.: like what??
  • T R Shankar Raman: Yes... but we should not avoid trying because it is difficult. When we began our work on rainforest restoration it was expected to be very difficult...
  • T R Shankar Raman: and some aspects are difficult... but we have been able to raise more than 130+ native tree species for restoration of degraded fragments...
  • rohit: thats good..
  • T R Shankar Raman: @Sandeep: immediate ecological effects: the effects of invasive alien species (such as Lantana camara) spreading into fragments
  • Sandeep Ghosh.: Shankar, what effect did your restoration work have on the raptors, since they stand on top of the food chain??
  • T R Shankar Raman: 'edge effects' such as desiccation, change in plant community, loss of canopy continuity for arboreal animals such as primates...
  • Sandeep Ghosh.: and raptors??
  • T R Shankar Raman: ...these are examples of more immediate ecological effects that may need attention in fragmented landscape
  • T R Shankar Raman: @Sandeep... cannot really say the effects on raptors, since they have such large home ranges... and our fragments/restoration sites are small...
  • Sandeep Ghosh.: ecological effects are both long term and short term? how does this affect fragmentation?
  • rohit: edge effects...can anybody help me in understanding it in simpler words
  • T R Shankar Raman: it is not suitable to reach scientific conclusions on the effects on raptors.
  • T R Shankar Raman: Lets talk about edge effects...
  • T R Shankar Raman: Imagine a dense forest that is now isolated, adjoining a very different habitat on one side: say a paddy field or a monoculture tea plantation
  • T R Shankar Raman: Also, imagine there is a road, widened into a highway, passing through the fragment... both these result in edge effects... but different types
  • Sandeep Ghosh.: if the core area : edge area ratio is reduced, that is my experience, then as a result of...
  • T R Shankar Raman: Along the agriculture field we have a hard edge... where closed canopy gives way to open, diversity to monoculture...
  • T R Shankar Raman: and in the open it is more sunny (hot), more exposed to light etc. This affects the plants and animals at the forest edge.
  • Sandeep Ghosh.: habitat fragmentation makes it difficult to conserve wildlife!
  • T R Shankar Raman: And not just at the edge, but this edge effect penetrates into the forest for some distance...
  • rohit: ok..
  • PRAVEEN V: and what is the effect of the road?
  • T R Shankar Raman: So one can have weedy plants spreading from the edge to the interior, the exposure leads to death of tall trees at the edge... this is edge effect...
  • PRAVEEN V: ok
  • rohit: so how does the plant and animals on edge got effected or adapt to this?
  • T R Shankar Raman: The road may have similar effects... for instance, weeds can spread along the disturbed roadsides and penetrate forests, but another effect...
  • Sandeep Ghosh.: also isolation of one fragmented area from other contiguous adjoining areas results in edge effects!
  • T R Shankar Raman: ...is that there are higher wind speeds and tree falls along roads.
  • PRAVEEN V: ok
  • T R Shankar Raman: Canopy continuity is affected. Tree-dwelling animals trying to cross on the ground may be killed by speeding traffic... some birds may avoid road edges...
  • rohit: hmm..the cloud is clearing now...
  • Sandeep Ghosh.: Shankar, come straight to the point! what is the solution in the PRACTICAL SENSE??
  • T R Shankar Raman: @ rohit: not all species can adapt to it... depends on species and kind of effect... the "edge penetration distance" varies by species and kind of factor
  • rohit: so this restoration you are talking about work at which particular area of forest and where first?
  • T R Shankar Raman: @ Sandeep: as we have been talking about: (1) ensuring that remnant habitats are protected, (2) corridors for animal movement are safeguarded...
  • Sandeep Ghosh.: PRACTICALLY HOW!!??
  • T R Shankar Raman: (3) degraded areas can be ecologically restored... well chosen locations, (4) understand that the surrounding habitats can also have value for wildlife
  • T R Shankar Raman: See examples from our website. Again, like I have already mentioned, we are working with private plantations to protect over 20 rainforest fragments.
  • Sandeep Ghosh.: THIS IS CERTAINLY NOT A ONE MAN JOB!
  • T R Shankar Raman: We have a nursery where we raise native plant species and plant them in carefully chosen degraded sites. In the surrounding landscape...
  • rohit: obviously not..
  • T R Shankar Raman: coffee planters are encouraged to use native tree species as shade ... this helps wildlife as well... these are the sort of practical steps required
  • T R Shankar Raman: But it will vary from place to place. And yes, it is not a one man job. It requires several people with different skills working together...
  • PRAVEEN V: Sir, coming to the action part - as an ordinary working man how can a person like me contribute to your cause?
  • T R Shankar Raman: I appreciate your interest. But more than contributing to my/our cause... it may be a good idea for you to take up this cause in areas of your interest
  • Sandeep Ghosh.: u need to coordinate with forest officers, local populace, and conservationists and politicians! a tall order!
  • rohit: @praveen i think as an urbanite we can do a little by..RECYCLE REUSE AND REDUCE !!!
  • T R Shankar Raman: Almost every place where we live, cities, towns, villages, countryside, forests, there are opportunities for conserving wildlife... even in fragmented landscape
  • Sandeep Ghosh.: my extremely long experience of the last 18 years has taught me the hard lesson!!!!!!!11111
  • T R Shankar Raman: Please dont be negative or lose heart... there is much you can do if you take interest and start... start small but start!
  • Sandeep Ghosh.: it seems to me that more than contribution, it is commitment which is sorely missing at least in Eastern India....
  • T R Shankar Raman: First, work to understand the landscape, read and interact with local people, forest officers, wildlife scientists... get a better understanding...
  • rohit: @ shankar...yes..positivity matters...even 1% of today,s work will mean a lot after a decade..
  • rohit: i mean conservation
  • Sandeep Ghosh.: and north eastern India where I live and work on Indian raptors and Indian rhinos!!
  • T R Shankar Raman: you will find then that there are many ways to engage. Some of the best restoration work in the world has come from citizens/local community
  • T R Shankar Raman: NE India has a lot of challenges... and is in the forefront of habitat fragmentation today. Lots of proposed dams, roads, mining, habitat alteration...
  • Sandeep Ghosh.: Shankar, please try to understand that the political situation in Eastern and North East is extremely fragile!
  • T R Shankar Raman: such work is quite needed there and people like you can make a difference.
  • Sandeep Ghosh.: and working there has a lot of political problems, period!!!!!!!!!!1
  • T R Shankar Raman: I worked on effects of slash and burn agriculture in Mizoram in 1994-5, and have colleagues working in Assam and Arunachal... I know what you mean.
  • T R Shankar Raman: @ Sandeep: dont focus so much on problems. Everyone knows there are so many problems. Begin to focus on solutions, on changing mind sets...
  • PRAVEEN V: Another question, since you have worked on elephant corridor
  • PRAVEEN V: Here in Palakkad, we have elephants entering fields during the monsoon months too
  • PRAVEEN V: you have any idea about the reason?
  • Sandeep Ghosh.: Shankar, please write to me at rhinos9848@gmail.com and tigers8269@gmail.com I need to interact with U MORE!!!!
  • T R Shankar Raman: At a fundamental level conservation can seem negative focussed on 'extinction' etc. but the other side of the coin 'restoration' looks ahead, too...
  • rohit: i am an MBBS graduate and have yet to start my work for conservation...experienced people like you can only inspire us..
  • T R Shankar Raman: I would not know the reason in your specific locality. It could be because of disruption of movement route, loss of habitat, need for water...
  • T R Shankar Raman: or perhaps some crops are attractive as food... we need to study the exact time and location of conflict incidents across years to better understand causes
  • T R Shankar Raman: There are a number of MBBS/Doctors among my friends colleagues who are active in conservation... you can be, too!
  • Sandeep Ghosh.: wildlife conservation in fragmented habitats and landscapes is definitely the future for all of us now!
  • PRAVEEN V: ok, may be food - Bananas :)
  • T R Shankar Raman: Its almost an hour now... anyone with any final quick question(s)?
  • Sandeep Ghosh.: shankar will you please correspond with me??
  • PRAVEEN V: thanks a lot for the inspiring session
  • bhavana sharma: thank u all ....m bhavana doing mca the discussion was very useful
  • Vinay Nadig: sorry to interrupt ..EDUCATION plays a big role ? and if yes would like to bring in th concept of ECOQUEST to reach out to people
  • PRAVEEN V: @Vinay - a very big role, yes
  • rohit: @shankar what could be the best way to head...M.sc degree in conservation biology or instead by any other way..??
  • T R Shankar Raman: Yes. Education plays a big role... especially for targetted awareness of issues... and sharing of ecological research findings. So that we
  • rohit: for myself
  • PRAVEEN V: what's Ecoquest?
  • T R Shankar Raman: can find better solutions. We have an EcoQuest/Nature Discovery Centre here in the Anamalais for several years now that plays this role.
  • T R Shankar Raman: And it is important that the education is not just targeted at children but at all ages and kinds of people in the community...
  • Susan Sharma: TRS, thanks for inspiring a great discussion. Would love to have you over again
  • T R Shankar Raman: Thanks all of you for the opportunity to share and discuss these ideas... and good night to all!
  • Sandeep Ghosh.: good nite!
  • PRAVEEN V: Good night all!
  • rohit: tanks to all and specially susan for the platform
  • Susan Sharma: Thank you all
  • T R Shankar Raman: Thanks Susan and bye...
Chat Archive
Conserving wildlife in fragmented landscapes - January, 2012
Urban Biodiversity - September, 2011
Green Hiking in the Himalayas - August, 2011
Role of Zoos in Conservation - July, 2011
Reduce, Recycle and Reuse - June, 2011
Black Necked Cranes - symbol of the rising Green Consciousness - May, 2011
Wildlife Issues in the North -East of India - April, 2011
Trekking in the Himalaya - March, 2011
Conservation of Marine Diversity in India - February, 2011
Plant native trees this monsoon - January, 2011
Human Elephant Conflict - December, 2010
Conservation and Development in Emerging India - November, 2010
"WILL ANIMALS ADAPT TO ANOTHER HABITAT........ - October, 2010
Responsible Tourism- Way forward to conservation? - September, 2010
Vulture Conservation in India - August, 2010
Plant a tree (trees) this monsoon - June, 2010
Role of Urban Birds - April, 2008
"Role of Urban Birds" - April, 2008
GM Foods and Bio-diversity - March, 2008
Taking Responsibility for One's Carbon Emissions - February, 2008
Ecological Security - January, 2008
The Himalayan Musk Deer - November, 2007
Urban Wildlife - October, 2007
Disappearing Tigers: Taking Stock - August, 2007
Garbage littered on our Streets - July, 2007
Bear Conservation nad Protection - June, 2007
Role of Captive Elephants in wildlife conservation - May, 2007
Endangered Animals of Sikkim - April, 2007
Citizen Participation in Environmental Issues - March, 2007
Vulture crisis in India - January, 2007
City Parks and Biodiversity - December, 2006
Why is bird census important? - November, 2006
Shooting Wildlife with a Camera - October, 2006
Rain Harvesting - September, 2006
Environmental Education - July, 2006
Tribal Bill - June, 2006
Trekking in the Himalaya Region - May, 2006
Trekking in the Himalayas - May, 2006
Coastal Wildlife - April, 2006
MARINE BIOLOGY - March, 2006
Atmospheric Brown Cloud - February, 2006
Tiger Census - January, 2006
Tiger Task Force Report - December, 2005
Marine Ecosystems Chat dated 18 November 2005 - November, 2005
Coral Reefs - October, 2005
Global Warming - September, 2005
Tourism and Wildlife - August, 2005
Environment Education - July, 2005
Wild Elephants - May, 2005
Tiger Census - April, 2005
Enforcement of Wildlife Act and the Common Man - January, 2005
Crane Migration - November, 2004
Migratory birds of India - October, 2004
Offences Against Wildlife - September, 2004
Offences Against Wildlife - September, 2004
Man Animal Conflict - August, 2004
Recent Amendments to the Wildlife Act - July, 2004
Is there a case for keeping large mammals in zoos? - June, 2004
Captive elephant management - May, 2004
Conservation of seaturtles - April, 2004
Asiatic Lion - March, 2004
Plight of lesser animals - February, 2004
Mangroves of India - January, 2004
DEER AND ANTELOPE - November, 2003
PHEASANTS - October, 2003
Amphibians - September, 2003
Chat on Butterflies - Our Natural Gardeners - April, 2003
Chat on Asian Elephant - January, 2003
Chat on Migratory Birds - December, 2002
Chat on Snakes - November, 2002
Chat on Rare Birds - August, 2002
Chat on Environmental Issues - July, 2002